Is America Getting Dumber From FLUORIDE in Drinking Water?

For decades, individual scientists have repeatedly pointed to health damage caused by fluoride. Dr. Dean Burk, biochemist and active in cancer research for over 30 years, warned as early as the 1980s of fluoride's cancer-causing effects. Nevertheless, the notion persists that fluoride is "healthy" or protects against cavities, which is why many consumers opt for fluoridized foods. Children of mothers who drink fluoridized water during pregnancy are demonstrably less intelligent. - At least in science, this information has been known for years, but is the price for better teeth in our offspring truly found in the chemical destruction of intelligence points?

Researchers in Canada are currently examining nerve tissue damage caused by fluoride in early childhood. In Germany, fluorine is not artificially added to drinking water, but fluoride does occur naturally in our water. According to statements from the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), more than 90 percent of drinking water contains less than 0.3 mg fluoride per liter. The limit value is 1.5 milligrams per liter. But are these values still up to date, and what happens if someone consumes several liters of water per day?

The dispute over fluoride is primarily fought out in the USA. 66% of Americans and 38% of Canadians drink fluoridized water because the state adds it to tap water. Affected countries also include Australia, Ireland, Singapore, Brazil, and Malaysia. In Malaysia, even 75% of people receive fluoridized water. In Europe, 3% are affected by artificial fluoridization of drinking water.

In 2017, a Mexican study found IQ loss in children, after examining 1,000 pregnant women and their children at ages four and six to twelve years after birth.
A study from 2019 financed by the U.S. and Canadian governments also shows that an increase in consumption of 1 mg fluoride per day by the expectant mother was associated with an IQ deficit of 3.7 points in her children.
The top health authority in the USA, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), claims despite more than 2,700 studies contradicting it that water fluoridization is one of the ten greatest achievements of the 20th century in the field of public health. The agency now finds itself in an awkward position. The American Dental Association (ADA), as well as two well-known front organizations of the chemical industry, the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) and the Science Media Centre (SMC), also find themselves in an awkward position. They have all been pushing and advocating for water fluoridization for decades.

The loss of intelligence points is a catastrophe, because when applied to society, a shift in IQ points by 3 or 4 points already represents a reduction in the number of geniuses by almost half and it also means that the number of mentally disabled children increases by about 50%. The study's results contradict so sharply the narrative about fluoride's positive effect against cavities that has been widespread for decades that one of the internationally most important medical journals took multiple precautions before publishing the study, and only after the study's correctness was verified by independent scientists and the editor issued a written statement explaining why he published it.